Stay ahead of SOC 2 by uncovering weaknesses before they turn into findings

Most SOC 2 readiness services give you a single point-in-time view. Acro IT’s approach goes much deeper and stays with you throughout the year. Instead of only showing what’s missing right now, we help you understand how controls behave over time, why they weaken, and what you need to keep them operating reliably.

What Sets Our SOC 2 Readiness Approach Apart

Hybrid monitoring with expert insight
You get the best of both worlds: automated, real-time checks and hands-on guidance from experienced SOC 2 specialists. Automation flags configuration issues, access mismatches, or missing evidence immediately, while our team uncovers process gaps, ownership challenges, and human-driven errors that tools alone can’t see.

Root-cause driven improvement
We don’t stop at identifying exceptions. We trace every issue back to the underlying cause, whether it’s a flawed workflow, unclear accountability, or a missing alert. This helps you fix the real problem and prevent repeat findings in future audits.

Risk-based prioritisation
Every gap is ranked by impact and likelihood, giving you a clear action plan. You’ll know exactly which issues could lead to significant SOC 2 findings and where to focus your time and budget to strengthen your posture quickly.

Integrated security testing
To validate the strength of your controls, we can add real-world testing where needed. Simulated attacks, penetration tests, and exploit-based reviews help confirm whether your environment can withstand practical threats — not just pass an audit.

Continuous monitoring to stay audit-ready
SOC 2 controls can drift quietly over time. Our continuous oversight alerts you the moment something changes, helping you maintain evidence, keep controls aligned to the Trust Services Criteria, and avoid last-minute chaos before the audit window.

Scenario-based response validation
We don’t rely on documents alone. Guided tabletop exercises and simulated incidents test how your response processes work under pressure. This exposes communication gaps, escalation delays, and unclear responsibilities before a real incident forces them into the spotlight.